More Rob Chapman

In case you weren’t convinced by my previous Rob Chapman video here’s another.

This was way back in 2008 long before  other things happened but he tells you how he got underway. Since then of course he has gone further than he might have expected in 2008.

What is perhaps notable about his advice is the lack of music biz jargon. SXSW is on again, and that’s a useful yardstick with its many pundits and acres of Powerpoint. He has none of that.

It is now well over a decade since I started writing about the music business online. And one of my key findings in that time is the irrelevance of media froth. It’s worse than irrelevant, it’s a distraction. Rob Chapman cheerfully ignores it.

Things have been quiet here for a year or so. There are many things I could do but I have spent a lot of time thinking rather than uploading. At the heart of this is froth overload and time wasted keeping “up-to-date” with irrelevance. There are things I must do to clean up the site and correct old info, so updates will occur. I also have new material but the hours, days and weeks I have recovered from froth have gone into real world activity so far. So apologies for the lack of stuff recently but that is why.


Blockbusters cover picA friend of mine drew my attention to this book (BLOCKBUSTERS Hit-making, Risk-taking, and the Big Business of Entertainment). My reading list is already way too long so I won’t get round to it for some time but the research is interesting.

The question it addresses is: should the entertainment industry bet bigger or smaller? The answer, with a lot of detailed examples, seems to be that blockbusters make bigger returns even taking into account big bets that fail.

To some extent this validates the longstanding (and to me baffling) record industry practice of signing 100 artists when only one will be successful.

(The rule of thumb always was that only one in ten signings release anything and one in ten of the releases make money. So, one in a hundred overall. In practice, post-2000, fewer artists get signed and fewer releases break even but the general principle remains.)

This also answers the question, if things carry on the same way, will the Internet fundamentally change how the music business mainstream works? Maybe not, after all.

If you have read it let me know what you think.

Dabbling with DAB

Is there a future for digital terrestrial radio in the UK?

DAB radio logoThere’s been a lot of chat in recent years about DAB. About the growth or lack of growth and about analogue switch-off in the same way analogue TV was switched off.

We have 5 DAB radios here, and terrestrial radio  has become a DAB thing for us. Mainly because there are more BBC channels on DAB.

But not in the car. Digital is useless in a car, even though it’s being fitted as standard these days.

I recently replaced two devices in the dining room—an old DAB radio and an old iPod player—with one new DAB radio. It has an audio input so we can play phones and music players through the radio. Then we noticed something very odd.

For those of you outside the UK, iPlayer Radio is a BBC app that streams BBC radio. So you might think it’s like DAB but it isn’t. It’s better. It streams all the UK BBC stations (Radio Ulster, Radio Scotland and Radio Cymru) and you can’t get Radio Scotland on a DAB player in most of England.

Now, that’s a small thing. And if you don’t care about the provinces it’s irrelevant to you. But it makes me wonder why I have a DAB radio. Except as an amp for the Internet.

An iPod plugged into the DAB radio can stream KGSR or WRIR from the USA. It can stream more BBC stations than DAB can. And any other radio station or web site online. The only place that isn’t practical is in the car (mobile data is too expensive at the moment). And DAB doesn’t work in the car anyway. So why have I got any DAB radios at all?

And why does the government want us to have DAB radios? We’re not daft, mostly.

As a terrestrial radio solution FM beats DAB hands down. It works everywhere and it works in the car. More often than not it sounds far better than DAB and a portable FM radio can run for weeks on one set of batteries. So that’s another reason DAB doesn’t move us forward.

For broadcasters the Internet is far cheaper than setting up a DAB station. Supply or demand, I can’t see a compelling argument for DAB either way. As a BBC listener I can’t see a compelling argument and as a driver DAB is simply irrelevant.

Increasingly music comes to us online: YouTube, cloud players, streaming stations and players. Time-shifting apps enable us to catch up online. If there was a neat, economic solution I would ditch all our DAB radios and simply plug in Wi-Fi players as needed.

The radio station structure locked inside the DAB box looks utterly pointless.